Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in dialysis at end of study compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
- RR 1.9 [0.92, 3.91]4 studies · 245 participantsLow
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in dialysis at end of study compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in remission at 6 months compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide may leads to higher relapse at the end of compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in adverse events ‐ treatment failure compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in serious infections compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in death at final compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).