Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in dialysis at end of study compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in remission at 6 months compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide may leads to higher relapse at the end of compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in adverse events ‐ treatment failure compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in serious infections compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
Pulse cyclophosphamide showed no clear difference in death at final compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes patency at 30 days compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether mechanical thrombectomy changes patency at 30 days compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether mechanical thrombectomy changes failure compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether mechanical thrombectomy changes technical success compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes failure compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether mechanical thrombectomy changes major adverse events compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether mechanical thrombectomy changes minor adverse events compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether mechanical thrombectomy changes death compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether continuous Infusion changes patency at 30 days compared with pulse spray technique (very low certainty).