evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

21 questions · 21 findings · 1 reviews · Injuries · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 21 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Single‐dose antibiotic vs 24 hours of antibiotics

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether single dose of antibiotics changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with 24 hours of antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐dose antibiotic vs 24 hours of antibiotics

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether single dose of antibiotics changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with 24 hours of antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

More than 24 hours of antibiotics vs 24 hours of antibiotics

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether more than 24 hours of antibiotics changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with 24 hours of antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

More than 24 hours of antibiotics vs 24 hours of antibiotics

All‐cause mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether more than 24 hours of antibiotics changes mortality compared with 24 hours of antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

More than 24 hours of antibiotics vs 24 hours of antibiotics

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether more than 24 hours of antibiotics changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with 24 hours of antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

All‐cause mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage changes mortality compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review