Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

9 questions · 9 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 11.1%Low 3 · 33.3%Moderate 1 · 11.1%High 4 · 44.4%

Personalised risk communication vs general risk information

Informed decision ‐ Numerical risk and categorised risk combined MMIC1 · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests

Personalised risk communication leads to higher informed decision ‐ Numerical risk and categorised risk combined MMIC1 compared with general risk information (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Personalised risk communication vs general risk information

Uptake of screening test ‐ Numerical and categorised risk combined Number of participants taking up the test · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests

Personalised risk communication may leads to higher uptake of screening test ‐ Numerical and categorised risk combined… compared with general risk information (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Personalised risk communication vs general risk information

Knowledge regarding screening test/condition concerned ‐ calculated risk score (numerical) versus general information proportion with good knowledge · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests

Personalised risk communication leads to higher knowledge regarding screening test/condition concerned ‐ calculated… compared with general risk information (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Personalised risk communication vs general risk information

Knowledge regarding screening test / condition concerned ‐ personal risk factor list v general information proportion with good knowledge · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests

Personalised risk communication leads to higher knowledge regarding screening test / condition concerned ‐ personal… compared with general risk information (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Personalised risk communication vs general risk information

Accurately‐perceived risk proportion of participants who perceived risk accurately · patients with informed decision making about taking screening tests

Personalised risk communication showed no clear difference in accurately‐perceived risk proportion of participants who perceived… compared with general risk information (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review