It is very uncertain whether natural cycle FET changes miscarriage rate per woman compared with modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether natural cycle FET changes ongoing pregnancy rate per woman compared with modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether natural cycle FET changes live birth rate per woman compared with modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether natural cycle FET changes multiple pregnancy rate per woman compared with HT FET (very low certainty).
Natural cycle FET showed no clear difference in live birth rate per woman compared with HT plus GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Natural cycle FET showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy rate per woman compared with HT plus GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty).
Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) showed no clear difference in live birth rate per woman compared with HT FET (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) showed no clear difference in ongoing pregnancy rate per woman compared with HT FET (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) showed no clear difference in live birth rate per woman compared with HT + GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty).
Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) showed no clear difference in miscarriage rate per woman compared with HT + GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.