Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

67 questions · 85 findings · 7 reviews · Haematology

No studies found 17 · 20%GRADE not reported 2 · 2.4%Very low 26 · 30.6%Low 12 · 14.1%Moderate 18 · 21.2%High 10 · 11.8%

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy vs usual care

Overall survival (at 36 months) · people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy probably leads to lower overall survival (at 36 months) compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy vs usual care

Progression‐free survival (PSF) · people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (at 24 months) compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30). Scale from: 0 to 100 (a higher score means a better outcome) · people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy vs usual care

Mortality within the longest · people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy probably leads to lower on‐study mortality (longest available compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy vs usual care

Serious adverse events at longest · people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy probably leads to higher serious adverse events (longest available compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy vs usual care

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy showed no clear difference in adverse events (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) (longest available compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy vs usual care

Adverse events: infections (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) (longest available · people with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma ineligible for transplant

Summary of findings table ‐ Daratumumab plus standard therapy probably leads to higher adverse events: infections (CTCAE grade ≥ 3) (longest available compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Aspirin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

All‐cause mortality · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes all‐cause mortality compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Aspirin vs low molecular weight heparin

All‐cause mortality · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes all‐cause mortality compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Aspirin vs low molecular weight heparin

Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes symptomatic deep vein thrombosis compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Aspirin vs low molecular weight heparin

Pulmonary embolism · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes pulmonary embolism compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Aspirin vs low molecular weight heparin

Major bleeding · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes major bleeding compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Aspirin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether aspirin (ASA) changes symptomatic deep vein thrombosis compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Vitamin K antagonists vs low molecular weight heparin

All‐cause mortality · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether vitamin K antagonist (VKA) changes all‐cause mortality compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Vitamin K antagonists vs low molecular weight heparin

Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether vitamin K antagonist (VKA) changes symptomatic deep vein thrombosis compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Vitamin K antagonists vs low molecular weight heparin

Pulmonary embolism · ambulatory patients with multiple myeloma receiving immunomodulatory agents

It is very uncertain whether vitamin K antagonist (VKA) changes pulmonary embolism compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review