Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 14.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 6 · 85.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ion-releasing restoration, glass ionomer-based (conventional GIC, HV-GIC, RMGIC, glass hybrid) vs Resin composite restoration

Secondary caries · Patients with permanent dentition in need of restorations (all cavity types: Black's Class I, II, V, and non-carious cervical lesions)

Pooled across follow-up periods, ion-releasing (GIC) and resin composite restorations show no significant difference in secondary caries (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.00; not separately GRADE-rated).

4 findings from 1 review

Secondary caries and marginal adaptation of ion-releasing versus resin composite restorations: a systematic review and… 2022 All outcomes
Overall (1 year, 18 months-2 years, and 3 years pooled) · Permanent dentition; university (majority), school, and private-practice settings across multiple countries (Turkey, Brazil, Sweden, India, Vietnam, Belgium, Germany, etc.)
RD -0.00 [-0.01, 0.00]
12 studies · 3085 participants
GRADE not reported
Secondary caries and marginal adaptation of ion-releasing versus resin composite restorations: a systematic review and… 2022 All outcomes
18 months-2 years · Permanent dentition; university (majority), school, and private-practice settings across multiple countries (Turkey, Brazil, Sweden, India, Vietnam, Belgium, Germany, etc.)
RD -0.00 [-0.01, 0.01]
8 studies · 1087 participants
Low
Secondary caries and marginal adaptation of ion-releasing versus resin composite restorations: a systematic review and… 2022 All outcomes
3 years · Permanent dentition; university (majority), school, and private-practice settings across multiple countries (Turkey, Brazil, Sweden, India, Vietnam, Belgium, Germany, etc.)
RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]
3 studies · 321 participants
Low

Show 1 more finding

Secondary caries and marginal adaptation of ion-releasing versus resin composite restorations: a systematic review and… 2022 All outcomes
1 year · Permanent dentition; university (majority), school, and private-practice settings across multiple countries (Turkey, Brazil, Sweden, India, Vietnam, Belgium, Germany, etc.)
RD -0.00 [-0.01, 0.01]
12 studies · 1677 participants
Low

Ion-releasing restoration, glass ionomer-based (conventional GIC, HV-GIC, RMGIC, glass hybrid) vs Resin composite restoration

Marginal adaptation (unacceptable marginal adaptation) · Patients with permanent dentition in need of restorations (all cavity types: Black's Class I, II, V, and non-carious cervical lesions)

At 3 years there were no marginal adaptation failures and no difference between ion-releasing (GIC) and resin composite restorations (RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02; low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Secondary caries and marginal adaptation of ion-releasing versus resin composite restorations: a systematic review and… 2022 All outcomes
3 years · Permanent dentition; university (majority), school, and private-practice settings across multiple countries (Turkey, Brazil, Sweden, India, Vietnam, Belgium, Germany, etc.)
RD 0.00 [-0.02, 0.02]
3 studies · 321 participants
Low
Secondary caries and marginal adaptation of ion-releasing versus resin composite restorations: a systematic review and… 2022 All outcomes
18 months-2 years · Permanent dentition; university (majority), school, and private-practice settings across multiple countries (Turkey, Brazil, Sweden, India, Vietnam, Belgium, Germany, etc.)
RD 0.03 [-0.02, 0.08]
7 studies · 1018 participants
Low
Secondary caries and marginal adaptation of ion-releasing versus resin composite restorations: a systematic review and… 2022 All outcomes
1 year · Permanent dentition; university (majority), school, and private-practice settings across multiple countries (Turkey, Brazil, Sweden, India, Vietnam, Belgium, Germany, etc.)
RD 0.01 [-0.02, 0.03]
9 studies · 1386 participants
Low