What do systematic reviews say?

Integrated management of childhood illness strategy vs usual care

Integrated management of childhood illness strategy showed no clear difference in mortality compared with routine care (low certainty).

• Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  Risk ratio 0.87 [0.68, 1.1]
  1 study · 5090 participants
  Low

Integrated management of childhood illness strategy vs usual care

Integrated management of childhood illness strategy showed no clear difference in nutritional status compared with routine care (low certainty).

• Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  Risk ratio 0.94 [0.84, 1.06]
  2 studies · 5242 participants
  Low

Integrated management of childhood illness strategy vs usual care

• Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 727 participants
  Very low

Integrated management of childhood illness strategy vs usual care

Integrated management of childhood illness strategy showed no clear difference in coverage of IMCI deliverables compared with routine care (moderate certainty).

• Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.92 [0.8, 1.05]
  2 studies · 4895 participants
  Moderate

Integrated management of childhood illness strategy vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found