Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 12.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 50%Low 2 · 25%Moderate 1 · 12.5%High 0 · 0%

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 286 participants
Low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

All‐cause mortality Time point of measurement: 2 months in 1 randomised study; 12 months in 3 randomised studies; 14 months in 1 non‐randomised study · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 1289 participants
Moderate

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Anxiety and depression · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1082 participants
Very low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Severity of PTSD symptoms · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 703 participants
Low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Physical function · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 422 participants
Very low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Cognitive function · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 622 participants
Very low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Ability to return to work or education (reported at 12 months) · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 386 participants
Very low

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

Adverse effects · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Follow‐up services for improving long‐term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found