Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

28 questions · 28 findings · 3 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 12 · 42.9%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 14.3%Low 5 · 17.9%Moderate 6 · 21.4%High 1 · 3.6%

Home‐based record combined with other interventions vs usual care

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBRf only · children aged 1 year

Home‐based record combined with other interventions may leads to higher proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBRf only compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Home‐based record combined with other interventions vs usual care

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBR + health educationg · children aged 1 year

Home‐based record combined with other interventions may leads to higher proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBR + health… compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Home‐based record combined with other interventions vs usual care

Proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBR + stickerh · children aged 1 year

Home‐based record combined with other interventions may leads to higher proportion of children who received DTP3 or Penta 3 ‐ HBR + stickerh compared with routine care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 4. Patients, caregivers and healthcare providers regarded the transition from the hospital to home as a challenging process given the lack of human and infrastructure resources available in the home setting. This may have an impact on the ...
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 13. Healthcare providers and policymakers highlighted the need for adequate equipment, infrastructure and maintenance both on the provider side and the patient side but described how these needs were not always met. They described challeng...
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 14. Patients and caregivers described many usability issues related to the device, the program or the application; they also emphasised the need for easy‐to‐use technologies that could be adapted to the patient’s individual needs. Patients...
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 5. Patients and healthcare providers described several factors that might affect patients’ motivation and engagement with telerehabilitation services, including support from healthcare providers or family members and other caregivers durin...
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 6. Patients, caregivers, and providers described a number of privacy and confidentiality issues when services were provided at home. These included the increased privacy of being able to exercise at home but also the loss of privacy when e...

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 10. Patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders described how telerehabilitation changed the nature of the patient‐provider relationship. This included overcoming physical barriers to communication and enabling quick ...

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Finding 11. Healthcare providers and patients described some aspects of telerehabilitation services at home as challenging. Healthcare providers described problems in assessing patients, their environment, and whether they were performing exercise...

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review