Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 60%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Well‐implemented hearing loss prevention programme (HLPP) vs less well‐implemented HLPP (hearing loss) · Hearing loss STS > 10 dB change average over 2, 3 and 4 kHz1
  Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.4 [0.23, 0.69]
  3 studies · 16301 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Hearing loss prevention programme (HLPP) vs non‐exposed workers (hearing loss) · Hearing loss Change in hearing threshold at 4 kHz in dB
  Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 1846 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Hearing loss prevention programme (HLPP) with exposure information vs HLPP without exposure information (hearing loss) · Annual increase in hearing threshold (dB/year at 2,3 and 4 kHz)
  Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  312 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Hearing loss prevention programme vs audiometric testing (hearing loss) · Hearing loss STS ≥ 10 dB loss average over 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear
  Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.85 [0.29, 2.44]
  1 study · 687 participants
  Moderate

Hearing loss prevention programme vs audiometric testing (hearing loss)

Hearing loss STS ≥ 10 dB hearing loss average over 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear · agricultural students without hearing loss

Hearing loss prevention programme showed no clear difference in hearing loss STS ≥ 10 dB loss average over 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear compared with audiometric testing (hearing loss) (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.85 [0.29, 2.44]
1 study · 687 participants
Moderate
Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.94 [0.46, 1.91]
1 study · 355 participants
Moderate

Hearing loss prevention programme vs non‐exposed workers

Hearing Loss Change in hearing threshold at 4 KHz · workers

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1846 participants
Very low

Well‐implemented hearing loss prevention programme vs Less well‐implemented hearing loss prevention programme

Hearing Loss STS > 10 dB change average over 2, 3 and 4 KHz1 · workers

It is very uncertain whether well‐implemented hearing loss prevention programme (HLPP) changes hearing loss STS > 10 dB change average over 2, 3 and 4 kHz1 compared with less well‐implemented HLPP (hearing loss) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.4 [0.23, 0.69]
3 studies · 16301 participants
Very low

Hearing loss prevention programme (HLPP) with exposure information vs HLPP without exposure information (hearing loss)

Annual increase in hearing threshold (dB/year at 2,3 and 4 kHz) · workers exposed to noise

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
312 participants
Very low