Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 2 · 66.7%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Composite resin with etch-and-rinse (total-etch) adhesion vs Composite resin with self-etch adhesion (same universal adhesive)

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth

No comparative effect estimate was reported; etch-and-rinse had a higher tabulated failure rate.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
1.5 years · University
Annual failure rate (%) etch-and-rinse 19.5%; self-etch 7.0%
1 study · 44 participants
GRADE not reported

Composite resin with etch-and-rinse (total-etch) adhesion vs Composite resin with self-etch adhesion (same universal adhesive)

Treatment failure (annual failure rate) · Children with moderately deep dentine caries in primary molars, no pulp therapy

Etch-and-rinse adhesion failed more than self-etch (19.5% vs 7.0% annual failure) in one RCT; low quality of evidence (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
18 months (Lenzi 2017) · University (Brazil) · Adhesive strategy (etch-and-rinse vs self-etch)
Annual failure rate (%) etch-and-rinse 19.5%; self-etch 7.0%
1 study · 44 participants
GRADE not reported

Bio-active restorative materials vs Other restorative approaches

Clinical effectiveness · Children with carious primary teeth

No eligible randomized clinical trials of bio-active restorative materials were found.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
At least 12 months
no estimate extracted
0 studies
No studies found