Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

30 questions · 30 findings · 1 reviews · Hepato-Biliary

No studies found 16 · 53.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 13 · 43.3%Low 1 · 3.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events (at 20 months) · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes proportion of people with ≥ 1 serious adverse events (at 20 months) compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Disease progression · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes proportion of people with disease progression compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Adverse events considered non‐serious · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation

Adverse events considered non‐serious · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver… changes adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) compared with liver transplantation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Double‐dose adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver transplantation vs liver transplantation

All‐cause mortality · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Double‐dose adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir… may leads to lower all‐cause mortality compared with liver transplantation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) vs hydroxycamptothecin

Overall survival Censored · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) changes overall survival Censored compared with hydroxycamptothecin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) vs hydroxycamptothecin

Disease progression · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and hydroxycamptothecin (rAd‐p53/HCT) changes proportion of people with disease progression compared with hydroxycamptothecin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and 5‐fluorouracil (rAd‐p53/5‐Fu) plus transarterial chemoembolisation vs chemoembolisation

Disease progression · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether recombinant human adenovirus‐p53 and 5‐fluorouracil (rAd‐p53/5‐Fu)… changes proportion of people with disease progression compared with transarterial chemoembolisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review