Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

19 questions · 19 findings · 2 reviews · Eyes and Vision

No studies found 3 · 15.8%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 10.5%Low 7 · 36.8%Moderate 3 · 15.8%High 4 · 21.1%

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose

BCVA: loss of 15 or more ETDRS letters · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin leads to lower loss of 3 or more lines (15 or more letters) visual acuity ETDRS chart compared with photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose

Six or more lines visual acuity lost · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin leads to lower loss of 6 or more lines (30 or more letters) visual acuity ETDRS chart compared with photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose

Gain of 3 or more lines of visual acuity · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin leads to higher gain of 3 or more lines (15 or more letters) compared with photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose

Adverse effects: acute severe visual acuity decrease · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin showed no clear difference in adverse effects: acute severe visual acuity decrease compared with photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin vs photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose

Adverse effects: infusion‐related back pain · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration

Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin leads to higher adverse effects: infusion‐related back pain compared with photodynamic therapy with 5% dextrose (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Radiotherapy vs control

Progression to visual loss (loss of 3 or more lines on logMAR chart) · people with neovascular AMD

Radiotherapy showed no clear difference in loss of 3 or more lines of best‐corrected visual acuity Measured… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Radiotherapy combined with anti‐VEGF vs anti‐VEGF alone

Progression to visual loss (loss of 3 or more lines on logMAR chart) · people with neovascular AMD

Radiotherapy combined with anti‐VEGF probably leads to higher loss of 3 or more lines of best‐corrected visual acuity Measured… compared with anti‐VEGF alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Radiotherapy combined with anti‐VEGF vs anti‐VEGF alone

Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · people with neovascular AMD

Radiotherapy combined with anti‐VEGF showed no clear difference in change in best corrected visual acuity (logMAR units) Measured using… compared with anti‐VEGF alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review