Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

48 questions · 48 findings · 9 reviews

No studies found 4 · 8.3%GRADE not reported 1 · 2.1%Very low 6 · 12.5%Low 20 · 41.7%Moderate 14 · 29.2%High 3 · 6.3%

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival · people with advanced gastric cancer

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Overall response rate Duration of · people with advanced gastric cancer

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy showed no clear difference in overall response rate Duration of compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Adverse event (any) Duration of · people with advanced gastric cancer

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy probably leads to higher adverse event (any) Duration of compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Severe adverse event (grade ≥ 3 ) Duration of · people with advanced gastric cancer

Summary of findings: Molecular‐targeted therapy plus chemotherapy probably leads to higher severe adverse event (grade ≥ 3 ) Duration of compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Failure of first‐line therapy · women withe low‐risk GTN

The intervention probably leads to higher failure of first‐line therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival · patients with extensive SCLC who relapsed or progressed after first‐line chemotherapy

The intervention may leads to lower overall survival (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life · patients with extensive SCLC who relapsed or progressed after first‐line chemotherapy

The intervention may leads to higher quality of life (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) vs chemotherapy alone

Overall survival (OS) · People with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Single‐immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) probably leads to lower overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival · People with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Single‐immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may leads to lower progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) vs chemotherapy alone

Overall response rate (ORR), · People with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer

Single‐immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may leads to higher overall response rate (ORR) compared with chemotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review