Endovascular thrombectomy interventions leads to higher favourable functional outcome at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).
Endovascular thrombectomy interventions leads to lower death from all causes at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).
Endovascular thrombectomy interventions showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).
Endovascular thrombectomy interventions probably leads to higher neurological status at the end of compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).
Endovascular thrombectomy interventions probably leads to higher degree of recanalisation (TIMI grade) compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes patency at 30 days compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes failure compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes technical success compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes major adverse events compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether surgical thrombectomy changes minor adverse events compared with different types of endovascular interventions (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in functional independence at 3 months (mRS 0 to 2) (primary outcome) compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b to 3) postprocedure compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).
Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).