Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 6 findings · 2 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 16.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 50%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Counselling vs no intervention

Mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer

Summary of findings: Counselling showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.08
1 study · 152 participants
Low

Counselling vs no intervention

Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Counselling vs no intervention

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer

Summary of findings: Counselling may leads to lower diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.12 [0.03, 0.47]
1 study · 74 participants
Low

Counselling vs no intervention

QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Counselling changes QOL scores (5‐point VAS; lower is better) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to reduce acute and late adverse gastrointestinal effects of pelvic radiotherapy for primary pelvic… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 152 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Counselling versus control: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes counselling versus control: uptake of screening (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.23 [1.04, 1.45]
2 studies · 393 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Counselling versus other: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes counselling versus other: uptake of screening (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.13 [0.9, 1.41]
1 study · 208 participants
Very low