Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 4 · 57.1%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · Pregnant women with/without complications

It is very uncertain whether computerised antenatal CTG changes apgar less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.31 [0.3, 5.74]
2 studies · 469 participants
Very low

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit · Pregnant women with/without complications

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Neurodevelopmental disability · Pregnant women with/without complications

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Caesarean section for non‐reassuring or abnormal fetal heart rate patterns · Pregnant women with/without complications

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Women's satisfaction with care · Pregnant women with/without complications

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Perinatal mortality · Pregnant women with/without complications

Computerised antenatal CTG probably leads to lower perinatal mortality compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.2 [0.04, 0.88]
2 studies · 469 participants
Moderate

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Caesarean section · Pregnant women with/without complications

Computerised antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.87 [0.61, 1.24]
1 study · 59 participants
Low