Computer‐assisted reconstruction surgery vs conventional operating techniques
Functional ability · People, primarily adults, undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 120 participantsModerate
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 20%Very low 1 · 20%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 1 · 20%High 0 · 0%
Computer‐assisted reconstruction surgery vs conventional operating techniques
Functional status at 2 years or more: Lysholm score (score 0 to 100: best function) · People, primarily adults, undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 120 participantsLow
Computer‐assisted reconstruction surgery vs conventional operating techniques
Activity level: Tegner score ( 0 to 10; higher scores = greater activity) · People, primarily adults, undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Computer‐assisted reconstruction surgery vs conventional operating techniques
IKDC knee examination grade normal (grade A) or nearly normal (grade B) ‐ Intermediate/long‐term · People, primarily adults, undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery
Computer‐assisted reconstruction surgery showed no clear difference in IKDC knee examination grade normal (grade A) or nearly normal (grade… compared with conventional operating techniques (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.01 [0.96, 1.06]3 studies · 173 participantsLow
Computer‐assisted reconstruction surgery vs conventional operating techniques
Adverse post‐surgical events · People, primarily adults, undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 140 participantsGRADE not reported