Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

13 questions · 15 findings · 3 reviews · Work

No studies found 1 · 6.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 20%Low 5 · 33.3%Moderate 6 · 40%High 0 · 0%

Combined interventions vs no intervention

Re‐employment Measured as percentage or number of participants who obtained paid employment · Unemployed job seekers

Combined interventions probably leads to higher re‐employment Measured as percentage or number of participants who… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Combined interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up to 6 months) · patients with coronary heart disease

Combined interventions may leads to higher proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Combined interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6 months ‐ 1 year) · patients with coronary heart disease

Combined interventions showed no clear difference in proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Combined interventions vs usual care

Return to work · patients with coronary heart disease

It is very uncertain whether combined interventions changes proportion of participants at work in the long term (> 1 to < 5 years) compared with usual care (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Combined interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants at work in the extended long term (≥ 5 years) · patients with coronary heart disease

It is very uncertain whether combined interventions changes proportion of participants at work in the extended long term (≥ 5… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support combined with alternative mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of upper body disorders (neck, shoulder, and upper extremity) Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support combined with alternative mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of upper body disorders (neck, shoulder, and upper… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support combined with alternative mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of neck/shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support combined with alternative mouse probably leads to lower incidence of neck or shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support combined with alternative mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support combined with alternative mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of right upper extremity disorder Questionnaire followed… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review