Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 12.5%Low 5 · 62.5%Moderate 2 · 25%High 0 · 0%

Circumcision devices vs standard surgical techniques

Serious adverse events · adolescent and adult male circumcisions

1 finding from 1 review

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 3472 participants
Moderate

Circumcision devices vs standard surgical techniques

Adverse events (moderate) · adolescent and adult male circumcisions

Circumcision devices showed no clear difference in moderate adverse events compared with standard surgical techniques (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.31 [0.55, 3.1]
10 studies · 3370 participants
Low

Circumcision devices vs standard surgical techniques

Adverse events mild adverse events · adolescent and adult male circumcisions

It is very uncertain whether circumcision devices changes mild adverse events compared with standard surgical techniques (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.09 [0.44, 2.72]
10 studies · 3370 participants
Very low

Circumcision devices vs standard surgical techniques

Operating time · adolescent and adult male circumcisions

1 finding from 1 review

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
14 studies · 4812 participants
Moderate

Circumcision devices vs standard surgical techniques

Pain during the first 24 hours (VAS means) · adolescent and adult male circumcisions

1 finding from 1 review

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 3022 participants
Low

Circumcision devices vs standard surgical techniques

Pain during the first 7 days (VAS means) · adolescent and adult male circumcisions

1 finding from 1 review

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 1430 participants
Low

Circumcision devices vs standard surgical techniques

Participant satisfaction · adolescent and adult male circumcisions

Circumcision devices may leads to higher participant satisfaction compared with standard surgical techniques (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.19 [1.04, 1.37]
15 studies · 4501 participants
Low

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs non‐digital, targeted communication

Health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer screening, cervical screening, voluntary medical male circumcision, HPV or HBV vaccination · Adults (age over 24 years)

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices showed no clear difference in health service utilization ‐ attendance for: breast cancer… compared with non‐digital, targeted communication (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.12 [0.92, 1.35]
3 studies · 1130 participants
Low