Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 5 · 62.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 37.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% vs artificial tears

HRQOL Ocular Surface Disease Index (scale 0 to 100, 100 worst) · Participants with ocular rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 37 participants
Low

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% vs artificial tears

Participant‐assessed improvement in rosacea severity ‐ not measured · Participants with ocular rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% vs artificial tears

Proportion of participants with adverse event · Participants with ocular rosacea

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with adverse event compared with artificial tears (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.32 [0.1, 53.42]
1 study · 37 participants
Low

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% vs artificial tears

Physician‐assessed improvement in rosacea severity Schirmer score · Participants with ocular rosacea

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 37 participants
Low

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% vs artificial tears

Assessment of erythema or telangiectasia ‐ not measured · Participants with ocular rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% vs artificial tears

Lesion count ‐ not measured · Participants with ocular rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% vs artificial tears

Time needed until improvement of the skin lesions · Participants with ocular rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Ciclosporin ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% vs artificial tears

Duration of remission ‐ not measured · Participants with ocular rosacea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for rosacea 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found