Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

8 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 1 · 12.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 25%Low 3 · 37.5%Moderate 2 · 25%High 0 · 0%

Cephalomedullary nails vs extramedullary implants

Functional status, early (within 4 months): using HHS (range from 0 to 100) and Johansen hip score (range from 0 to 100); higher scores indicate better function · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures

Cephalomedullary nails showed no clear difference in functional status, early (≤ 4 months): using Zűckerman functional… compared with extramedullary implants (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cephalomedullary nails vs extramedullary implants

Mobility · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures

It is very uncertain whether cephalomedullary nails changes mobility (≤ 4 months): assessed as number of participants with… compared with extramedullary implants (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cephalomedullary nails vs extramedullary implants

Mortality, early (≤ 4 months) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures

Cephalomedullary nails showed no clear difference in mortality, early (≤ 4 months) compared with extramedullary implants (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cephalomedullary nails vs extramedullary implants

Unplanned return to theatre (end of · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures

Cephalomedullary nails showed no clear difference in unplanned return to theatre (at end of compared with extramedullary implants (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review