INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs NON‐INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT
Relapse · people with severe mental disorders
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
27 questions · 27 findings · 2 reviews · Schizophrenia · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 15 · 55.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 18.5%Low 5 · 18.5%Moderate 2 · 7.4%High 0 · 0%
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs NON‐INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT
Leaving the study early · people with severe mental disorders
Intensive Case Management may leads to lower global state: 1. Leaving the study early ‐ by long term compared with non‐Intensive Case Management (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.7 [0.52, 0.95]7 studies · 1970 participantsLow
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs NON‐INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT
Social functioning 2. Employment status ‐ by medium term ‐ spent > 1 day employed · people with severe mental disorders
It is very uncertain whether intensive Case Management changes social functioning 2. Employment status ‐ by medium term ‐ spent > 1… compared with non‐Intensive Case Management (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.46 [0.45, 4.74]1 study · 73 participantsVery low
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs NON‐INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT
Mental state: No clinically important improvement · people with severe mental disorders
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs NON‐INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT
Service use: 1. Average number of days in hospital per month ‐ by about 24 months · people with severe mental disorders
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted21 studies · 2220 participantsModerate
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs NON‐INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT
Service use: 3b. Average number of admissions (skewed data ‐ sample size ≧ 200) ‐ by long term · people with severe mental disorders
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 678 participantsModerate
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs NON‐INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT
Adverse event: 1b. Death ‐ suicide ‐ by long term · people with severe mental disorders
Intensive Case Management showed no clear difference in adverse event: 1b. Death ‐ suicide ‐ by long term compared with non‐Intensive Case Management (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.88 [0.27, 2.84]3 studies · 1152 participantsLow
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care
Service use: 1. Average number of days in hospital per month ‐ by about 24 months · people with severe mental disorders
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted24 studies · 3595 participantsLow
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care
Adverse event: 1b. Death ‐ suicide ‐ by long term · people with severe mental disorders
Intensive Case Management showed no clear difference in adverse event: 1b. Death ‐ suicide ‐ by long term compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.68 [0.31, 1.51]9 studies · 1456 participantsLow
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care
Relapse · people with severe mental disorders
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care
Leaving the study early · people with severe mental disorders
Intensive Case Management may leads to lower global state: 1. Leaving the study early ‐ by long term compared with standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.68 [0.58, 0.79]13 studies · 1798 participantsLow
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care
Social functioning: 2. Employment status (various measurements) ‐ by long term ‐ not employed at the end of the trial · people with severe mental disorders
It is very uncertain whether intensive Case Management changes social functioning: 2. Employment status (various measurements) ‐ by… compared with standard care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.7 [0.49, 1]4 studies · 1129 participantsVery low
INTENSIVE CASE MANAGEMENT vs usual care
Mental state: No clinically important improvement · people with severe mental disorders
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Cognitive behavioural therapy + intensive case management vs usual care
Lost to treatment · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
1 finding from 1 review
- Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 59 participantsVery low
Cognitive behavioural therapy + intensive case management vs usual care
Adverse event: Death · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Cognitive behavioural therapy + intensive case management vs usual care
Alcohol use ‐ not measured · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Cognitive behavioural therapy + intensive case management vs usual care
Drug (non‐alcohol) use ‐ not measured · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Cognitive behavioural therapy + intensive case management vs usual care
Mental state ‐ not measured · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Cognitive behavioural therapy + intensive case management vs usual care
Global State ‐ not measured · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Cognitive behavioural therapy + intensive case management vs usual care
Quality of life/life satisfaction ‐ not measured · people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found