Bioactive restorative materials (RMGIC and compomer combined) vs Resin composite restoration
Secondary caries · Patients requiring dental restoration; deciduous (primary) teeth
In deciduous teeth at 1 year, pooled bioactive materials (RMGIC and compomer) showed no significant difference from resin composite in secondary caries (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.07-4.10; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
- Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network… 2023 All outcomes1 year of follow-up · Restorative dentistry clinical settings; primary studies conducted across multiple countries · Overall (all bioactive vs resin composite)RR 0.54 [0.07, 4.10]3 studies · 321 participantsGRADE not reported