Social cognitive theory showed no clear difference in HIV incidence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard counseling (moderate certainty).
Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in consistent application of condom by FSWs compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
Promotion of female and male condom showed no clear difference in HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (low certainty).
Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).
Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).
Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower consistent male condom use at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).
Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower consistent female condom use by FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).
Social cognitive theory showed no clear difference in syphilis incidence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard counseling (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether VCT changes syphilis prevalence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard care of STI (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether VCT changes gonorrhoea prevalence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard care of STI (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether VCT changes chlamydia prevalence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard care of STI (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether VCT changes trichomonas prevalence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard care of STI (very low certainty).
VCT may leads to lower genital warts prevalence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard care of STI (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether VCT changes consistent condom use by FSWs with clients at 6‐month compared with standard care of STI (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether VCT changes HIV/STI knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard care of STI (very low certainty).
Social cognitive theory showed no clear difference in gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard counseling (moderate certainty).
Social cognitive theory probably leads to lower any STIs incidence among FSWs at 6‐month compared with standard counseling (moderate certainty).