Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in pressure ulcer incidence Visual skin assessment compared with ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment (low certainty).
Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in pressure ulcer incidence Visual skin assessment compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).
Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in pressure ulcer incidence Visual skin assessment compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether braden pressure ulcer risk assessment and training changes pressure ulcer incidence Visual skin assessment compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement and training (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether braden pressure ulcer risk assessment and training changes pressure ulcer incidence Visual skin assessment compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement alone (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether assessment changes rate of caesarean section compared with direct admission (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether assessment changes rate of instrumental vaginal birth compared with direct admission (very low certainty).
Assessment may leads to lower use of epidural or any regional anaesthesia compared with direct admission (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether assessment changes apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes compared with direct admission (very low certainty).
Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 compared with ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment (low certainty).
Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 compared with ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).
Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).
Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).