Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 4 · 80%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 20%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Aseptic technique vs clean technique · Number with symptomatic UTI
  Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.2 [0.54, 2.66]
  1 study · 36 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Aseptic technique vs clean technique · Participant‐assessed outcome(preference)
  Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
Direct match · question page
- Aseptic technique vs clean technique · Adverse effects (urethral trauma/bleeding/haematuria)
  Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
Direct match · question page
- Aseptic technique vs clean technique · Participant‐assessed outcome(satisfaction)
  Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found
Direct match · question page
- Aseptic technique vs clean technique · Cost‐effectiveness
  Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Aseptic technique vs clean technique

Number of participants with symptomatic UTI · long‐term bladder management

Aseptic technique showed no clear difference in number with symptomatic UTI compared with clean technique (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.2 [0.54, 2.66]
1 study · 36 participants
Low

Aseptic technique vs clean technique

Adverse effects (urethral trauma/bleeding/haematuria) · long‐term bladder management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Aseptic technique vs clean technique

Participant‐assessed outcome(satisfaction) · long‐term bladder management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Aseptic technique vs clean technique

Participant‐assessed outcome(preference) · long‐term bladder management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Aseptic technique vs clean technique

Cost‐effectiveness · long‐term bladder management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found