Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 1 · 50%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement vs 2-stage (submerged) implant placement

Aesthetics evaluated by dentists (soft tissue recession) · People with dental implants

1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement showed no clear difference in aesthetics evaluated by dentists (soft tissue recession) compared with 2-stage (submerged) implant placement; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 to 12 months after loading
MD -0.20 [-0.67, 0.27]
1 study · 29 participants
GRADE not reported

1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement vs 2-stage (submerged) implant placement

Patient preference including aesthetics (split-mouth studies only) · People with dental implants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 to 12 months after loading
Planned outcome (patient preference including aesthetics, only in split-mouth studies); no included trial reported it.
0 studies
No studies found