Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 5 · 71.4%GRADE not reported 1 · 14.3%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

ART using composite resin vs Conventional treatment using composite resin

Participant experience (dental anxiety) · Children with carious primary teeth

ART using composite resin showed no clear difference in participant experience (dental anxiety) compared with conventional treatment using composite resin; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
MD 0.00 [-0.52, 0.52]
1 study · 57 participants
GRADE not reported

ART using composite resin vs Conventional treatment using composite resin

Pain · Children with carious primary teeth

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
Pain: Not measured.
0 studies
No studies found

ART using composite resin vs Conventional treatment using composite resin

Restoration failure (permanent dentition) · Children with carious primary teeth

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
No studies reported on restoration failure in the permanent dentition for this comparison.
0 studies
No studies found

ART using composite resin vs Conventional treatment using composite resin

Adverse events · Children with carious primary teeth

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
Adverse events: Not measured.
0 studies
No studies found

ART using composite resin vs Conventional treatment using composite resin

Restoration failure (primary dentition) · Children with carious primary teeth

It is very uncertain whether ART using composite resin changes restoration failure (primary dentition) compared with conventional treatment using composite resin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
24 months · Multiple surface lesions
OR 1.11 [0.54, 2.29]
1 study · 57 participants
Very low

ART using composite resin vs Conventional treatment using composite resin

Secondary caries · Children with carious primary teeth

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
No studies reported on secondary caries for this comparison.
0 studies
No studies found

ART using composite resin vs Conventional treatment using composite resin

Costs (direct and indirect) · Children with carious primary teeth

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
No studies reported on costs for this comparison.
0 studies
No studies found