evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 3 · 75%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems vs regular systems

Incidences of blood contamination ‐ Active systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems may leads to higher incidences of blood contamination ‐ Active systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems vs regular systems

Incidences of blood contamination ‐ Passive systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems showed no clear difference in incidences of blood contamination ‐ Passive systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems vs regular systems

Incidence of blood leakage ‐ Active systems · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems may leads to lower incidence of blood leakage ‐ Active systems compared with regular systems (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

(RCT) Safe intravenous systems vs regular systems

Needlestick injuries · preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel

It is very uncertain whether (RCT) Safe intravenous systems changes needlestick injuries compared with regular systems (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review