Intervention not reported
TIPS(1 RCT; 63 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in TIPS(1 RCT; 63 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Portocaval shunt(1 RCT; 45 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in portocaval shunt(1 RCT; 45 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers plus Sclerotherapy(1 RCT; 40 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes beta‐blockers plus Sclerotherapy(1 RCT; 40 participants) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.26 [0.17, 10.1]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
TIPS(1 RCT; 80 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes TIPS(1 RCT; 80 participants) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.52 [0.39, 6.6]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers(1 RCT; 28 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes beta‐blockers(1 RCT; 28 participants) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.46 [0, 43.25]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers(9 RCTs; 493 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in beta‐blockers(9 RCTs; 493 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.88 [0.66, 1.18]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes no active intervention(No direct RCT) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.19 [0, 1726.76]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers(6 RCTs; 420 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention probably leads to higher beta‐blockers(6 RCTs; 420 participants) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.62 [1.14, 2.38]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers plus sclerotherapy(4 RCTs; 231 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention probably leads to lower beta‐blockers plus sclerotherapy(4 RCTs; 231 participants) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.6 [0.37, 0.95]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(3 RCTs; 296 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention probably leads to higher no active intervention(3 RCTs; 296 participants) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.61 [1.01, 2.86]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
TIPS(2 RCTs; 109 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention probably leads to lower TIPS(2 RCTs; 109 participants) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.18 [0.08, 0.38]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers plus nitrates(No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in beta‐blockers plus nitrates(No direct RCT) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 2.13 [0.79, 5.86]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Portocaval shunt(No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention probably leads to lower portocaval shunt(No direct RCT) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.21 [0.05, 0.77]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers(1 RCT; 65 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention may leads to higher beta‐blockers(1 RCT; 65 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers plus Sclerotherapy(8 RCTs; 370 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in beta‐blockers plus Sclerotherapy(8 RCTs; 370 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.69 [0.43, 1.09]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
No active intervention(4 RCTs; 412 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in no active intervention(4 RCTs; 412 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.2 [0.83, 1.84]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
TIPS(3 RCTs; 189 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in TIPS(3 RCTs; 189 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.94 [0.56, 1.59]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Beta‐blockers plus Nitrates(No direct RCT) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in beta‐blockers plus Nitrates(No direct RCT) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.91 [0.53, 1.58]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Portocaval shunt(2 RCTs; 100 participants) · people with liver cirrhosis and previous oesophageal variceal bleeding
The intervention showed no clear difference in portocaval shunt(2 RCTs; 100 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.21 [0.68, 2.15]
Studies not reported
Low
Mortality (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube
It is very uncertain whether higher threshold (500 mL per six hours or greater) changes mortality (at the end of compared with lower threshold (less than 500 mL per six hours) at time of aspiration (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review