Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in maternal‐fetal attachment compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).
Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in antenatal hospital admission rate per cluster (mean) compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).
Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in low birthweight (< 2500 g or < 10th centile) compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).
Group antenatal care showed no clear difference in low birthweight (<2500 g) compared with individual antenatal care (adjusted data) (moderate certainty).
Group antenatal care showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality (stillbirth or neonatal death) compared with individual antenatal care (adjusted data) (low certainty).
Group antenatal care showed no clear difference in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (admission of baby to… compared with individual antenatal care (adjusted data) (moderate certainty).
Group antenatal care probably leads to higher satisfaction with antenatal care (possible values 81‐405,… compared with individual antenatal care (adjusted data) (moderate certainty).
Group antenatal care showed no clear difference in breastfeeding initiation compared with individual antenatal care (adjusted data) (moderate certainty).
Group antenatal care showed no clear difference in spontaneous vaginal birth compared with individual antenatal care (adjusted data) (high certainty).
Traditional antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether computerised antenatal CTG changes apgar less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Traditional antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether traditional antenatal CTG changes apgar less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (very low certainty).
Traditional antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.