Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,970 questions · 2,433 findings · 231 reviews

No studies found 303 · 12.5%GRADE not reported 759 · 31.2%Very low 357 · 14.7%Low 476 · 19.6%Moderate 418 · 17.2%High 120 · 4.9%

ASA + high‐dose LMWH vs ASA + low‐dose LMWH or UFH

Subcutaneous bruises · people with antiphospholipid antibodies and no history of thrombosis

ASA + high‐dose LMWH showed no clear difference in subcutaneous bruises compared with ASA + low‐dose LMWH or UFH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anticoagulant with or without ASA vs ASA only

Minor bleeding · people with antiphospholipid antibodies and no history of thrombosis

Anticoagulant with or without ASA may leads to higher bleeding ‐ minor (not requiring hospital admission) Median compared with ASA only (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anticoagulant with or without ASA vs ASA only

Adverse event other than bleeding · people with antiphospholipid antibodies and no history of thrombosis

Anticoagulant with or without ASA led to lower adverse event other than bleeding compared with ASA only; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

LABA/LAMA vs LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)

Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%

LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA/ICS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LABA/LAMA vs LAMA

Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%

LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review