Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,325 questions in 34 reviews · Oral medicine and oral cancer

current versions
No studies 164 · 12.4%Ungraded 841 · 63.5%Very low 209 · 15.8%Low 72 · 5.4%Moderate 38 · 2.9%High 1 · 0.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; palifermin or repifermin), intravenous vs Placebo
Number of days unable to take medicine orally · Adults with cancer receiving treatment
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome (planned secondary outcome not measured by any study in the review)0 studiesNo studies
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Salivary flow rate (mg/5 min, unstimulated) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 12 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD 0.32 [0.09, 0.55]1 study · 27 participantsVery low
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Progression-free survival · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 12 to 24 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.94 [0.70, 1.27]2 studies · 247 participantsUngraded
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; palifermin or repifermin), intravenous vs Placebo
Adverse events · Adults with cancer receiving treatment
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
Adverse events attributed to KGF were typically oral-related or skin-related; mostly mild to moderate with very few serious events; reporting poor and inconsistent, not appropriate to meta-analyse (SoF comments cell,…16 studiesUngraded
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, single dose) vs Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim, multiple doses)
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Children receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplantation after conditioning therapy for mixed cancers · Children
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.82, 1.27]1 study · 61 participantsUngraded
Biperiden plus pilocarpine vs No treatment
Survival · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
Survival not reported.0 studiesNo studies
Palifermin vs Placebo
Salivary flow rate · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
None of the trials evaluating palifermin provided data on salivary flow rates.0 studiesNo studies
Epidermal growth factor (EGF), oral spray vs Placebo
Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment · Chemoradiotherapy to the head and neck
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.78, 1.43]1 study · 136 participantsUngraded
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), intravenous vs Chlorhexidine mouthwash
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia receiving chemotherapy alone · Children
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.54, 0.85]1 study · 90 participantsUngraded
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Dysgeusia (grade >= 2, 0-4 scale) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.24 [0.10, 0.61]1 study · 28 participantsUngraded
Zinc supplements vs Acupuncture
Outcome NR · Patients with taste disturbances (dysgeusia/hypogeusia; idiopathic, zinc-deficient, or secondary to chronic renal…
Interventions for managing taste disturbances (2017) · Cochrane
Authors' conclusions: We were unable to draw any conclusions regarding the superiority of zinc supplements or acupuncture as none of the trials compared these interventions.0 studiesNo studies
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, single dose) vs Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim, multiple doses)
Normalcy of diet (total parenteral nutrition) · Children receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplantation after conditioning therapy for mixed cancers · Children
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.94, 1.06]1 study · 61 participantsUngraded
Selenium vs No intervention
Xerostomia · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 6 weeks after end of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No evidence that selenium reduced xerostomia; data unusable (bar charts with no standard deviations) (Buntzel 2010)1 studyUngraded
Palifermin vs Placebo
Overall survival · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 42 to 72 months from baseline
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
HR 1.00 [0.72, 1.39]3 studiesModerate
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) vs Placebo or no treatment
Oral mucositis (severe) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment · RT to head and neck
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.37 [0.15, 0.87]2 studies · 54 participantsLow
Antiseptic mouthrinse vs Placebo
Salivary flow rate · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
Salivary flow rate was only reported during radiotherapy (i.e. not at any of the time points of interest); no usable data (Lanzos 2010)1 studyUngraded
Erythropoietin mouthwash vs Placebo
Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Adults receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplantation after conditioning therapy for haematological cancers
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.43 [0.24, 0.79]1 study · 80 participantsUngraded
Pilocarpine vs No treatment/placebo
Salivary flow rate (unstimulated) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · Up to and including 3 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD -0.06 [-0.23, 0.11]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Amifostine 200 mg/m2 three times weekly vs Amifostine 200 mg/m2 five times weekly
Survival (overall survival and locoregional control) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
Insufficient evidence reported on overall survival or locoregional tumour control (Analysis 4.2; 4.3)1 studyUngraded
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; palifermin or repifermin), intravenous vs Placebo
Quality of life · Adults with cancer receiving treatment
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome (planned secondary outcome not measured by any study in the review)0 studiesNo studies
Biperiden plus pilocarpine vs No treatment
Side effects · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No data were reported on side effects.0 studiesNo studies
Amifostine (intravenous) vs Amifostine (subcutaneous)
Locoregional tumour control · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 48 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
HR 1.34 [0.76, 2.36]1 studyUngraded
Bethanechol vs Placebo
Survival · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No survival data were reported.0 studiesNo studies
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Cost (mean per-patient supportive care costs) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
Mean per-patient supportive care costs lower with amifostine (USD 4401) than control (USD 5873); P = 0.02 (Buntzel 1998 / Bennett 2001)1 study · 28 participantsUngraded
Pilocarpine vs No treatment/placebo
Xerostomia (objective, LENT-SOMA scale) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 6 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD -0.40 [-0.69, -0.11]1 study · 39 participantsUngraded
Zinc supplements (zinc sulphate, zinc gluconate, zinc picolinate, zinc acetate, or polaprezinc) vs Placebo
Taste acuity improvement - objective outcome (continuous) - individual taste sensations · Patients with taste disturbances (dysgeusia/hypogeusia; idiopathic, zinc-deficient, or secondary to chronic renal… · Chronic renal failure
Interventions for managing taste disturbances (2017) · Cochrane
Results (Mahajan 1980, chronic renal failure; Analysis 1.3): mean difference by taste sensation - salt MD 285 (95% CI 238.75 to 331.25); sweet MD 190 (142.36 to 237.64); sour MD 10 (-16.43 to 36.43); bitter MD 2.40…1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Amifostine (intravenous) vs Amifostine (subcutaneous)
Salivary flow rate · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No salivary flow rate data related to routes of administration of amifostine were reported.0 studiesNo studies
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Adverse effects (other reported events) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
Alopecia, skin toxicity, hot flush, drowsiness, sneezing, hiccupping, dizziness and fatigue reported narratively or only for the amifostine group; insufficient evidence of a differenceNRUngraded
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Xerostomia (grade >= 2, 0-4 scale) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.35 [0.19, 0.67]3 studies · 119 participantsLow
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Allergic response (adverse effect) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 7.51 [1.40, 40.39]3 studies · 524 participantsLow
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) vs Placebo or no treatment
Adverse events · Adults with cancer receiving treatment
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
Limited evidence of adverse events for G-CSF; 2 of 6 studies did not report; low rates of mild to moderate events, most commonly bone pain (SoF comments cell, not GRADE-rated)6 studiesUngraded
Polaprezinc vs Azulene oral rinse
Taste disturbance (severe, > 2 on 0-3 scale) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · Over RT period
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.12 [0.02, 0.83]1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Palifermin vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No evidence of a difference in reported adverse events across the three trials (nausea, fever, constipation, diarrhoea, headache, fatigue and others)3 studiesUngraded
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), mouthwash vs Sucralfate mouthwash
Normalcy of diet (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) · Adults receiving radiotherapy to the head and neck · RT to head and neck
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.18 [0.01, 3.56]1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Bethanechol vs Artificial saliva
Xerostomia (dry mouth, yes/no) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.63 [0.30, 1.29]1 study · 36 participantsUngraded
Chinese medicine vs No treatment/placebo
Xerostomia (VAS) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
Difference in favour of Chinese medicine on VAS xerostomia (P < 0.05); standard deviations not available (Wang 1998)1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) vs Placebo or no treatment
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment · Chemotherapy alone for lung cancer
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.59 [0.40, 0.87]1 study · 195 participantsUngraded
Antimicrobial lozenge vs Placebo
Xerostomia · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · Up to and including 3 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.16 [0.97, 1.40]1 study · 133 participantsUngraded
Antiseptic mouthrinse vs Placebo
Quality of life · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No quality of life data were reported.0 studiesNo studies
Selenium vs No intervention
Survival · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No survival data were reported.0 studiesNo studies
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; palifermin or repifermin), intravenous vs Placebo
Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment · BMT/SCT after conditioning for haematological cancers
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.80, 0.99]6 studies · 852 participantsLow
Polaprezinc vs Azulene oral rinse
Xerostomia (severe) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.17 [0.04, 0.65]1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Xerostomia (grade >= 2, 0-4 scale) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 12 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.70 [0.40, 1.23]7 studies · 682 participantsLow
Chinese medicine vs No treatment/placebo
Xerostomia (dichotomous, Shenqi Fanghou recipe) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.39 [0.28, 0.55]1 study · 140 participantsUngraded
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; palifermin or repifermin), intravenous vs Placebo
Oral pain (mean worst pain, 0 to 10 scale) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment · BMT/SCT after conditioning for haematological cancers
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
MD -0.85 [-3.00, 1.30]1 study · 42 participantsUngraded
Amifostine (intravenous) vs Amifostine (subcutaneous)
Adverse effects · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
Increased hypotension with intravenous delivery (20% vs 8%; P = 0.007); skin rash (10% vs 22%; P = 0.012) and local pain at injection site (0% vs 8%; P = 0.001) worse with subcutaneous; inconclusive for…1 studyUngraded
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) vs Placebo or no treatment
Oral mucositis (any severity) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment · RT to head and neck
Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: cytokines and… (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.86, 1.22]2 studies · 54 participantsUngraded
Bethanechol vs Placebo
Quality of life · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No data on either quality of life or other oral related symptoms were reported.0 studiesNo studies
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Vomiting (adverse effect) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
RR 4.90 [2.87, 8.38]5 studies · 601 participantsLow
Zinc supplements (zinc sulphate, zinc gluconate, zinc picolinate, zinc acetate, or polaprezinc) vs Placebo
Taste acuity improvement - objective outcome (continuous) - taste detection (cross-over trial) · Patients with taste disturbances (dysgeusia/hypogeusia; idiopathic, zinc-deficient, or secondary to chronic renal… · 6 months, Children with chronic renal failure
Interventions for managing taste disturbances (2017) · Cochrane
MD 2.50 [0.93, 4.07]1 study · 14 participantsVery low