Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

480 questions · 494 findings · 38 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 118 · 23.9%GRADE not reported 54 · 10.9%Very low 176 · 35.6%Low 99 · 20%Moderate 34 · 6.9%High 13 · 2.6%

Intervention not reported

Test result · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis positive by Xpert MTB/XDRRole: an initial…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

True positivespeople with ethionamide resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis positive by Xpert MTB/XDRRole: an initial…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 167 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

False negativespeople incorrectly classified as not having ethionamide resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis positive by Xpert MTB/XDRRole: an initial…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 167 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

True negativespeople without ethionamide resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis positive by Xpert MTB/XDRRole: an initial…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 267 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

False positivespeople incorrectly classified as having ethionamide resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis positive by Xpert MTB/XDRRole: an initial…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 267 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Test result · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis‐positive by Xpert MTB/XDR Index test: Xpert…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

True positivespeople with amikacin resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis‐positive by Xpert MTB/XDR Index test: Xpert…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 65 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

False negativespeople incorrectly classified as not having amikacin resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis‐positive by Xpert MTB/XDR Index test: Xpert…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 65 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

True negativespeople without amikacin resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis‐positive by Xpert MTB/XDR Index test: Xpert…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 425 participants
High

Intervention not reported

False positivespeople incorrectly classified as having amikacin resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with known rifampicin resistance, detected as tuberculosis‐positive by Xpert MTB/XDR Index test: Xpert…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 425 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Test result · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis irrespective of rifampicin resistance (i.e. whether or not their rifampicin resistance status was…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

True positivespeople with isoniazid resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis irrespective of rifampicin resistance (i.e. whether or not their rifampicin resistance status was…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 756 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

False negativespeople incorrectly classified as not having isoniazid resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis irrespective of rifampicin resistance (i.e. whether or not their rifampicin resistance status was…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 756 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

True negativespeople without isoniazid resistance · adults with pulmonary tuberculosis irrespective of rifampicin resistance (i.e. whether or not their rifampicin resistance status was…

1 finding from 1 review

Xpert MTB/XDR for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, ethionamide, and… 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 327 participants
Moderate

Two-band palatal expander with slow expansion vs Two-band palatal expander with rapid expansion

Molar expansion · Children and adults with a posterior crossbite, without a Class III skeletal relationship, cleft lip or palate (or both), or other…

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
7 months after start of treatment
Martina 2012: slow 6.3 mm (SD 2.1) vs rapid 5.7 mm (SD 1.6); reported as no statistically significant difference in text (PUB2 MD 0.60, 95% CI -0.85 to 2.05); Table 1 lists P<0.001 (discrepant)
1 study · 26 participants
GRADE not reported

Two-band palatal expander with slow expansion vs Two-band palatal expander with rapid expansion

Crossbite correction · Children and adults with a posterior crossbite, without a Class III skeletal relationship, cleft lip or palate (or both), or other…

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
Martina 2012: slow 12/12 vs rapid 14/14; NS (all corrected in both groups)
1 study · 26 participants
GRADE not reported

Slow shock wave lithotripsy vs rapid shock wave lithotripsy

Stone‐free rate

It is very uncertain whether slow shock wave lithotripsy changes stone‐free rate compared with rapid shock wave lithotripsy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.25 [1.16, 4.36]
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Slow shock wave lithotripsy vs rapid shock wave lithotripsy

Serious adverse events or complications of treatment

1 finding from 1 review

Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Slow shock wave lithotripsy vs rapid shock wave lithotripsy

Secondary procedures

It is very uncertain whether slow shock wave lithotripsy changes secondary procedures compared with rapid shock wave lithotripsy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.38 [0.11, 1.28]
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Slow shock wave lithotripsy vs rapid shock wave lithotripsy

Hospital stay — not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found