Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

346 questions · 375 findings · 54 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 84 · 22.4%GRADE not reported 18 · 4.8%Very low 93 · 24.8%Low 103 · 27.5%Moderate 62 · 16.5%High 15 · 4%

Less intensive vs more intensive follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Depression · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colorectal, head‐and‐neck, Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, non‐small cell lung…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐specialist‐led vs specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment

Depressive symptoms · adult cancer survivors from the following cancer sites: breast, colon, colorectal, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, melanoma and oesophageal

Non‐specialist‐led showed no clear difference in depression (at 12 months) HADS‐Depression subscale (higher scores… compared with specialist‐led follow‐up after primary cancer treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pharmacists' non‐dispensing roles targeting non‐hospitalised patients vs the delivery of no comparable service

% outside blood pressure range · health problem or population

Pharmacists' non‐dispensing roles targeting non‐hospitalised patients may leads to lower % outside blood pressure range compared with the delivery of no comparable service (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Economic outcomes Health service costs (including prescribing costs) Cost effectiveness · General practitioners/family doctors involved in the management of patients with other musculoskeletal conditions

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review