EEG sedative‐induced artefact · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) may leads to lower EEG sedative‐induced artefact compared with melatonin oral (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of children with clinical adverse events (any) · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) showed no clear difference in number of children with clinical adverse events (any) compared with melatonin oral (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who successfully completed neurodiagnostic procedure without interruption by the child awakening · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of children who required a further dose of either the same sedative agent or the addition of a different sedative agent · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Time to adequate sedation (minutes or as measured by specific validated scales such as the Ramsay Sedation Score) · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children with inadequate level of sedation (Ramsay score below 4) · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
Chloral hydrate oral (70 mg/kg) may leads to lower proportion of children with inadequate level of sedation (Ramsay… compared with promethazine oral (1 mg/kg) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of children who had sedation failure or inadequate level of sedation · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
Chloral hydrate oral (70 mg/kg) probably leads to lower proportion of children who had sedation failure or inadequate level… compared with promethazine oral (1 mg/kg) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of children with clinical adverse event: behavioural change · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
Chloral hydrate oral (70 mg/kg) showed no clear difference in number of children with clinical adverse event: behavioural change compared with promethazine oral (1 mg/kg) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of children with clinical adverse event: nausea or vomiting · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
Chloral hydrate oral (70 mg/kg) showed no clear difference in number of children with clinical adverse event: vomiting or nausea compared with promethazine oral (1 mg/kg) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to adequate sedation (minutes or as measured by specific validated scales such as the Ramsay Sedation Score) · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
1 finding from 1 review
Sedation duration (minutes) · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
1 finding from 1 review
Number of children with clinical adverse event: drowsiness · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) probably leads to lower number of children with clinical adverse event: drowsiness compared with clonidine oral (4 μg/kg) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of children with clinical adverse event: vertigo · children undergoing neurodiagnostic procedures
Chloral hydrate oral (50 mg/kg) showed no clear difference in number of children with clinical adverse event: vertigo compared with clonidine oral (4 μg/kg) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Plaque · people with stroke
One oral healthcare intervention showed no clear difference in dental plaque (Analysis 3.1) compared with another oral healthcare intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Denture plaque · people with stroke
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Presence of related infection: pneumonia · people with stroke
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes vaginal birth within 24 hours compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Caesarean section · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes caesarean section compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Uterine hyperstimulation with fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes
1 finding from 1 review
Oxytocin augmentation · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes
It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes oxytocin augmentation compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review