evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

528 questions · 535 findings · 57 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 147 · 27.5%GRADE not reported 66 · 12.3%Very low 121 · 22.6%Low 115 · 21.5%Moderate 78 · 14.6%High 8 · 1.5%

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation vs usual care

Thromboembolic events · Patients on long‐term anticoagulant therapy (treatment duration longer than two months) irrespective of the indication for treatment

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation probably leads to lower thromboembolic events compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation vs usual care

All‐cause mortality · Patients on long‐term anticoagulant therapy (treatment duration longer than two months) irrespective of the indication for treatment

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation vs usual care

Major bleeding · Patients on long‐term anticoagulant therapy (treatment duration longer than two months) irrespective of the indication for treatment

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in major haemorrhage compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation vs usual care

Minor haemorrhage · Patients on long‐term anticoagulant therapy (treatment duration longer than two months) irrespective of the indication for treatment

Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in minor haemorrhage compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Continuous glucose monitoring system vs intermittent modalities

All‐cause mortality during initial hospitalization ‐ not reported · infants at risk of hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) changes death during initial hospitalization (all‐cause mortality) compared with intermittent modalities (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ structured telephone support or telemonitoring vs usual care

All‐cause mortality: Structured telephone support versus usual care · patients with heart failure

Summary of findings ‐ structured telephone support or telemonitoring probably leads to lower all‐cause mortality: Structured telephone support versus usual care compared with usual care ‐ all‐cause mortality (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs observation

Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · staff caring for patients at risk of pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether monitoring and observation changes incidence of new pressure ulcers compared with observation alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review