Intervention not reported
MS‐MLPA (against MSP or PSQ) · people with glioblastoma undergoing treatment with temozolomide Outcome being predicted: overall survival (time to death)
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
PCR‐HRM (against MSP or PSQ) · people with glioblastoma undergoing treatment with temozolomide Outcome being predicted: overall survival (time to death)
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer
Apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Specific adverse events: gastrointestinal perforations or fistulae ‐ not reported · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Specific adverse events: haemorrhage · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Specific adverse events: thromboembolic events ‐ not reported · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events: hypertension · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer
Apatinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy may leads to higher specific adverse events: hypertension compared with chemotherapy or chemotherapy/brachytherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events ‐ not reported · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Economic evaluation ‐ not measured · women with recurrent or FIGO stage IVB cervical cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
All intervention options · people with first recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV), BEV + lomustine (LOM), regorafenib (REG), fotemustine…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
BEV+IRI (1 RCT, 79 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention leads to higher BEV+IRI (1 RCT, 79 participants) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+VB111 (1 RCT, 128 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention leads to higher BEV+VB111 (1 RCT, 128 participants) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+TRC 105 (1 RCT, 49 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention leads to higher BEV+TRC 105 (1 RCT, 49 participants) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All intervention options · people with first recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV), BEV + lomustine (LOM), regorafenib (REG), BEV + irinotecan…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Outcomes (5 RCTs, 1024 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV(8 RCTs; 498 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
FOM (1 RCT, 32 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention showed no clear difference in FOM (1 RCT, 32 participants); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+HSPPC96 1 RCTs; 53 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention showed no clear difference in BEV+HSPPC96 1 RCTs; 53 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+ONA(1 RCT; 64 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention showed no clear difference in BEV+ONA(1 RCT; 64 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
BEV+CAB (1 RCT; 58 participants) · people with any recurrence of glioblastoma Interventions: bevacizumab (BEV) Comparison: bevacizumab 9BEV), BEV+carboplatin (CAB),…
The intervention showed no clear difference in BEV+CAB (1 RCT; 58 participants) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review