Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,822 questions · 1,891 findings · 321 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 279 · 14.8%GRADE not reported 46 · 2.4%Very low 524 · 27.7%Low 571 · 30.2%Moderate 330 · 17.5%High 141 · 7.5%

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy

Clinical improvement: Rutherford classification improvement Rutherford classification · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting showed no clear difference in clinical improvement: Rutherford classification improvement… compared with remote endarterectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

OUTBACK re‐entry catheter vs manual re‐entry

months' patency rate · 52 people with TASC‐II D superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusions

OUTBACK re‐entry catheter showed no clear difference in months' patency rate compared with manual re‐entry (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

OUTBACK re‐entry catheter vs manual re‐entry

Primary patency ( · 52 people with TASC‐II D superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusions
2 findings from 1 review

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy

Clinical improvement: ABI improvement Significant postexercise ABI improvement · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting showed no clear difference in clinical improvement: ABI improvement Significant postexercise ABI… compared with remote endarterectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting vs remote endarterectomy

months' patency rate · 95 people with Rutherford 3 to 5 TASC‐II D lesions

Subintimal angioplasty with stenting showed no clear difference in months' patency rate compared with remote endarterectomy (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review