Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,788 questions · 1,849 findings · 336 reviews

No studies found 245 · 13.3%GRADE not reported 126 · 6.8%Very low 612 · 33.1%Low 512 · 27.7%Moderate 305 · 16.5%High 49 · 2.7%

Bae: AZT/3TC/NVP vs Other Short Course Regimen

Mother to Child Transmission at 1 Month · HIV‐infected pregnant women

It is very uncertain whether tonwe‐Gold continued: AZT/3TC/NVP changes mother to Child Transmission of HIV at 1 Month compared with other Short Course Regimen (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bae: AZT/3TC/NVP vs Other Short Course Regimen

Mother to Child Transmission at 12 Months · HIV‐infected pregnant women

It is very uncertain whether tonwe‐Gold continued: AZT/3TC/NVP changes mother to Child Transmission of HIV at 12 Months compared with other Short Course Regimen (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Kesho Bora: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r vs Short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP)

Maternal Grade 3/4 Severe Adverse Events · HIV‐infected Pregnant Women With CD4 Counts 200‐500 Cells/mm3

It is very uncertain whether kesho Bora: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r changes maternal Grade 3/4 Severe Adverse Events compared with short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Kesho Bora: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r vs Short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP)

Infant Grade 3/4 Severe Adverse Events · HIV‐infected Pregnant Women With CD4 Counts 200‐500 Cells/mm3

Kesho Bora: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r showed no clear difference in infant Grade 3/4 Severe Adverse Events compared with short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Kesho Bora: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r vs Short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP)

Prematurity · HIV‐infected Pregnant Women With CD4 Counts 200‐500 Cells/mm3

It is very uncertain whether kesho Bora: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r changes prematurity compared with short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Kesho Bora: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r vs Short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP)

Low birthweight · HIV‐infected Pregnant Women With CD4 Counts 200‐500 Cells/mm3

Kesho Bora continued: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r showed no clear difference in low Birth Weight compared with short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Kesho Bora: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r vs Short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP)

Stillbirth · HIV‐infected Pregnant Women With CD4 Counts 200‐500 Cells/mm3

Kesho Bora continued: AZT/3TC/LPV‐r showed no clear difference in stillbirths compared with short‐Course AZT (intrapartum AZT/3TC/sd‐NVP) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer implants (vertical augmentation) vs Short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation

Severe pain for > 1 week · Patients with atrophic (resorbed) mandibles needing implants

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer… led to higher severe pain for > 1 week compared with short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer implants (vertical augmentation) vs Short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation

Experienced the operation negatively · Patients with atrophic (resorbed) mandibles needing implants

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer… showed no clear difference in experienced the operation negatively compared with short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer implants (vertical augmentation) vs Short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation

No improvement of facial appearance (3 weeks) · Patients with atrophic (resorbed) mandibles needing implants

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer… led to lower no improvement of facial appearance (3 weeks) compared with short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer implants (vertical augmentation) vs Short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation

Prosthetic failure (2 years) · Patients with atrophic (resorbed) mandibles needing implants

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer… showed no clear difference in prosthetic failure compared with short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer implants (vertical augmentation) vs Short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation

Major complications · Patients with atrophic (resorbed) mandibles needing implants

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer… led to higher major complications compared with short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer implants (vertical augmentation) vs Short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation

Implant failure · Patients with atrophic (resorbed) mandibles needing implants

Inlay/interposed bone graft (iliac or Bio-Oss block) + longer… showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with short implants (8 to 11 mm) without augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

ULTRA LOW DOSE (<2 mg/day) vs ANY DOSE ‐ short term

Leaving the study early · patients with schizophrenia

ULTRA LOW DOSE (<2 mg/day) showed no clear difference in leaving the study early: Any reason ‐ when compared with… compared with ANY DOSE ‐ short term (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

LOW DOSE (greater than or equal to 2‐<4 mg/day) vs ANY DOSE ‐ short term

Leaving the study early: any reason ‐ when compared with high dose ( greater than or equal to 10 mg) · patients with schizophrenia

LOW DOSE (greater than or equal to 2‐<4 mg/day) probably leads to higher leaving the study early: any reason ‐ when compared with high dose (… compared with ANY DOSE ‐ short term (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LOW DOSE (greater than or equal to 2‐<4 mg/day) vs ANY DOSE ‐ short term

Global state: No clinically important improvement ‐ global evaluation ‐ when compared with standard‐higher dose (greater than or equal to 6‐<10 mg/day) · patients with schizophrenia

LOW DOSE (greater than or equal to 2‐<4 mg/day) probably leads to higher global state: No clinically important improvement ‐ global… compared with ANY DOSE ‐ short term (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LOW DOSE (greater than or equal to 2‐<4 mg/day) vs ANY DOSE ‐ short term

Global state: 1. No clinically important improvement ‐ CGI‐I ‐ when compared with high dose (greater than or equal to 10 mg/day) · patients with schizophrenia

LOW DOSE (greater than or equal to 2‐<4 mg/day) showed no clear difference in global state: No clinically important improvement ‐ global… compared with ANY DOSE ‐ short term (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LOW DOSE (greater than or equal to 2‐<4 mg/day) vs ANY DOSE ‐ short term

Adverse effects: 5a. Movement disorders ‐ specific symptoms ‐ EPS: unspecified ‐ versus standard‐lower dose (greater than or equal to 4‐<6 mg/day) · patients with schizophrenia

LOW DOSE (greater than or equal to 2‐<4 mg/day) probably leads to lower adverse effects: 5a. Movement disorders ‐ specific symptoms ‐ EPS:… compared with ANY DOSE ‐ short term (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review