Haemoglobin (g/dL) · people at risk of malaria
Habitat manipulation and modification with larviciding showed no clear difference in haemoglobin levels compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Moderate
EIR · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
GRADE not reported
Density of adult mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Moderate
Density of immature mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Moderate
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
It is very uncertain whether habitat manipulation changes malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.01 [0, 0.16]
2 participants
Very low
EIR · people at risk of malaria
It is very uncertain whether habitat manipulation changes EIR compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.05 [0, 1.03]
1 participants
Very low
Density of adult mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Low
Density of immature mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 3 participants
Low
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
It is very uncertain whether habitat manipulation with larviciding changes malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.59 [0.42, 0.83]
1 participants
Very low
Density of adult mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
0.49 [0.47, 0.5]
1 participants
Low
Density of immature mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Low
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
Habitat manipulation and modification with larviciding showed no clear difference in malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.8 [0.41, 1.55]
1 participants
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Cognitive function using validated neuropsychological tests · patients with a primary brain tumour, within two weeks of surgical intervention
1 finding from 1 review
Psychophysical testing for recovery of sense of smell · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
It is very uncertain whether systemic corticosteroids plus intranasal… changes psychophysical testing for recovery of sense of smell compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
1 finding from 1 review
Change in sense of smell · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
1 finding from 1 review
Generic quality of life measures · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Presence of parosmia · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Other adverse outcomes · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
1 finding from 1 review
Disease‐related quality of life · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found