Clinical response: mean score/change in mental state: mean PANSS total score (high = poor) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical response: mean score/change in global state: mean CGI‐II Global improvement score (high = poor) Short term (6 weeks) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical response: mean score/change in mental state: mean PANSS total score (high = poor) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical response: mean score/change in global state: mean CGI‐S score (high = poor) Medium term (12 weeks) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical response: mean score/change in mental state: mean PANSS total score (high = poor) · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Mental state · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Mean postoperative best‐corrected visual acuity · people with cataract and age‐related macular degeneration
1 finding from 1 review
Vision‐related quality of life · people with cataract and age‐related macular degeneration
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Relapse, progression or death (calculated instead of PFS) sensitivity analysis ‐ without HD6trial due to high risk of other bias
The intervention probably leads to lower relapse, progression or death (calculated instead of PFS)… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.24 [0.07, 0.88]
900 participants
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Mortality sensitivity analysis (calculated instead of overall survival) ‐ without UK NCRI Rapid trial and MSKCC trial #90‐44due to high risk of other bias
The intervention probably leads to lower mortality sensitivity analysis (calculated instead of overall… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Joint mobility Range of motion Scale from 0°‐135° (higher number reflects better outcome) · people with neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Participation restrictions 100 mm return to usual work activities VAS (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Activity limitations 18‐point upper limb scale (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Joint mobility Range of motion Scale from 0°‐90° (higher number reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Quality of life 160‐point Burn Specific Health Scale‐Brief questionnaire (higher score reflects better outcome) · people with non‐neurological conditions1
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical response: mean score/change in mental state: mean PANSS total score (high = poor) · patients with schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review
Functional independence · Treating patients with traumatic brain injury
It is very uncertain whether cognitive rehabilitation changes independence in ADL FIM, with 18 items in basic and psychosocial… compared with conventional treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Community integration · Treating patients with traumatic brain injury
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life Perceived Quality of Life scale. Scores range from 10 to 100, higher scores indicate better quality of life. · Treating patients with traumatic brain injury
1 finding from 1 review
Spasticity at up to 6 hours after treatment (measured by the Ashworth Scale, 0‐, with a higher score indicating greater spasticity) · adults with traumatic brain injury with spasticity in their arms and legs
1 finding from 1 review