Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

612 questions in 46 reviews · Work

current versions
No studies 78 · 12.7%Ungraded 4 · 0.7%Very low 295 · 48.2%Low 182 · 29.7%Moderate 49 · 8%High 4 · 0.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Arm support combined with alternative mouse vs conventional mouse alone
Work related function · office workers
Ergonomic interventions for preventing work‐related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Arm support with conventional mouse vs conventional mouse alone
Incidence of upper body disorders Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers
Ergonomic interventions for preventing work‐related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.42, 1.8]2 studies · 191 participantsLow
Arm support with conventional mouse vs conventional mouse alone
Incidence of neck or shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers
Ergonomic interventions for preventing work‐related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck… (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.12, 6.98]2 studies · 186 participantsLow
Arm support with conventional mouse vs conventional mouse alone
Incidence of right upper extremity disorders Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers
Ergonomic interventions for preventing work‐related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck… (2018) · Cochrane
OR 1.07 [0.58, 1.96]2 studies · 178 participantsModerate
Progressive computer glasses vs monofocal computer glasses
Asthenopia (change from baseline to 12 months) VAS scale 0 to 100 12 months' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 186 participantsLow
Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs bifocal computer lenses
Headache (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
OR 1.43 [0.27, 7.55]1 study · 36 participantsVery low
Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs bifocal computer lenses
Nausea (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [0.68, 2.45]1 study · 8 participantsVery low
Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs bifocal computer lenses
Dizziness (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.25, 4]1 study · 8 participantsVery low
Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs trifocal computer glasses
Asthenopia (eyestrain severity) Likert scale 0 to 10 3 weeks · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs trifocal computer glasses
Asthenopia (eyestrain frequency) Likert scale 0 to 10 3 weeks' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs monofocal computer glasses
Asthenopia (change from baseline to 12 months) VAS scale 0 to 100 12 months' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 64 participantsLow
Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs monofocal computer glasses
Headache (change from baseline to 12 months) VAS scale 0 to 100 12 months' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 64 participantsVery low
Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses
Asthenopia, summed score scale 1 to 140 3 weeks' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses
Asthenopia Change score 3 weeks' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses
Eyestrain (yes/no) · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.67, 1.34]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Progressive computer glasses vs monofocal computer glasses
Headache (change from baseline to 12 months) VAS scale 0 to 100 12 months' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 186 participantsLow
Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses
Headache (yes/no) · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.92 [0.52, 1.63]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Computer glasses vs Ergonomic assessment plus habitual (computer) glasses
Upset stomach (yes/no) · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.14, 1.79]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs progressive glasses
Asthenopia (two different scales), Short term · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 58 participantsLow
Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs progressive glasses
Asthenopia Medium term · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsLow
Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs progressive glasses
Headache scale 1 to 6 1‐week · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 23 participantsLow
Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs progressive glasses
Dizziness score 1 to 6 1‐week · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 23 participantsLow
Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs monofocal computer glasses
Asthenopia (change from baseline to 12 months) VAS scale 0 to 100 12 months' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 64 participantsLow
Progressive computer glasses with intermediate distance focus vs monofocal computer glasses
Headache (change from baseline to 12 months) VAS scale 0 to 100 12 months' · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 64 participantsVery low
Progressive computer glasses with far distance focus vs bifocal computer lenses
Asthenopia (improvement of symptoms after 4 weeks) · computer workers
Optical correction of refractive error for preventing and treating eye symptoms in computer users (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.8, 1.24]1 study · 38 participantsVery low
Alternative desks and workstations vs sit‐desks
Mean difference in time spent sitting at work, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted10 studies · 323 participantsLow
Information, feedback, and/or counselling vs information only or no intervention
Mean difference in time spent sitting at work, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 103 participantsLow
Information, feedback, and/or counselling vs information only or no intervention
Mean difference in time in sitting bouts lasting 30 minutes or more, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 28 participantsLow
Information, feedback, and/or counselling vs information only or no intervention
Mean difference in time spent sitting at work, medium‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 257 participantsLow
Information, feedback, and/or counselling vs information only or no intervention
Mean difference in time in sitting bouts lasting 30 minutes or more, medium‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention
Mean difference in time spent sitting at work, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 573 participantsVery low
Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention
Mean difference in time in sitting bouts lasting 30 minutes or more, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 518 participantsVery low
Alternative desks and workstations vs sit‐desks
Mean difference in time in sitting bouts lasting 30 minutes or more, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted74 participantsVery low
Alternative desks and workstations vs sit‐desks
Mean difference in time in sitting bouts lasting 30 minutes or more, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Alternative desks and workstations vs sit‐desks
Mean difference in time spent in inactive sitting at work, medium‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 54 participantsLow
Workplace policy changes vs no intervention or alternate intervention
Mean difference in time spent sitting at work, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 179 participantsLow
Workplace policy changes vs no intervention or alternate intervention
Mean difference in time in sitting bouts lasting 30 minutes or more, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Information, feedback, and/or counselling vs information only or no intervention
Mean difference in time spent sitting at work, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 63 participantsLow
Information, feedback, and/or counselling vs information only or no intervention
Mean difference in time spent sitting at work, medium‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 747 participantsLow
Information, feedback, and/or counselling vs information only or no intervention
Mean difference in time in sitting bouts lasting 30 minutes or more, short‐term · employees who sit at work
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Physical ergonomic intervention vs no intervention
Number of workers with newly diagnosed WMSD (incident cases) · Dentists
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Physical ergonomic intervention vs no intervention
Self‐reported complaints of MSD pain in thighs (Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire) · Dentists
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.23, 1.42]1 study · 102 participantsVery low
Physical ergonomic intervention vs no intervention
Self‐reported complaints of MSD pain in feet (Nordic musculoskeletal questionnaire) · Dentists
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.29, 1.41]1 study · 102 participantsVery low
Physical ergonomic intervention vs no intervention
Work functioning or disability · Dentists
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Physical ergonomic intervention vs alternative instrument design
Number of workers with newly diagnosed WMSD (incident cases) · Dentists and dental hygienists who performed scaling, root planing, or dental prophylaxis procedures
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Physical ergonomic intervention vs alternative instrument design
Self‐reported complaints of MSD pain in right upper extremity – elbow, forearm (0‐ to 10‐point scale; 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain) · Dentists and dental hygienists who performed scaling, root planing, or dental prophylaxis procedures
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 108 participantsLow
Physical ergonomic intervention vs alternative instrument design
Self‐reported complaints of MSD pain in right upper extremity – shoulder (0‐ to 10‐point scale; 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain) · Dentists and dental hygienists who performed scaling, root planing, or dental prophylaxis procedures
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 108 participantsLow
Physical ergonomic intervention vs alternative instrument design
Work functioning or disability · Dentists and dental hygienists who performed scaling, root planing, or dental prophylaxis procedures
Ergonomic interventions for preventing musculoskeletal disorders in dental care practitioners (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
High correlated colour temperature light vs standard illumination
Alertness · daytime workers
Workplace lighting for improving alertness and mood in daytime workers (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted163 participantsVery low
Individually applied blue‐enriched light vs no treatment
Adverse events · daytime workers
Workplace lighting for improving alertness and mood in daytime workers (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies