Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

483 questions · 519 findings · 42 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 136 · 26.2%GRADE not reported 9 · 1.7%Very low 136 · 26.2%Low 150 · 28.9%Moderate 68 · 13.1%High 20 · 3.9%

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Emotional abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 558 participants
Low

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Emotional abuse CTS mean change from baseline · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 110 participants
Moderate

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Overall abuse Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA) score. Scale from 0 to 30 · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 53 participants
Low

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Physical abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 558 participants
Moderate

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Physical abuse by severity ‐ severe Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) mean change from baseline · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 110 participants
Moderate

Brief advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Sexual abuse CTS and Partner Abuse Scale (PAS)e · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 239 participants
Moderate

Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Physical abuse Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS; 80 items rated on a 7‐point scale) · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 265 participants
Low

Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Physical abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse

It is very uncertain whether intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate… changes physical abuse (dichotomous outcome) compared with usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.61 [0.33, 1.14]
2 studies · 182 participants
Very low

Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Emotional abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse

Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate… showed no clear difference in emotional abuse (dichotomous outcome) compared with usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.58 [0.3, 1.13]
1 study · 141 participants
Moderate

Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Emotional abuse Index of Psychological Abuse (IPA; 33 items rated on a 4‐point scale) · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 265 participants
Very low

Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Overall abuse One study used a composite of two scales (12 items. Scale from 0 to 36) Other study used Composite Abuse Scale (CAS)i (30 items presented in a 6‐point format requiring respondents to answer 'never', 'only once', 'several times', 'mon... · women with intimate partner abuse

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 181 participants
Very low

Intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate partner abuse vs (Optimised) usual care

Overall abuse (dichotomous outcome) · women with intimate partner abuse

It is very uncertain whether intensive advocacy interventions for women who experience intimate… changes overall abuse (dichotomous outcome) compared with usual care at up to 12‐month follow‐up (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well‐being of women… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.72 [0.29, 1.79]
1 study · 103 participants
Very low

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

DBT vs TAU · adults who engage in SH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

Repetition of SH at 12 months · adults who engage in SH

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable… showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at 12 months' compared with treatment (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.36 [0.05, 2.47]
2 studies · 172 participants
Low
Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.18 [0.35, 3.95]
1 study · 97 participants
Very low

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

Repetition of SH at final · adults who engage in SH

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable… showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at final compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.57 [0.21, 1.59]
3 studies · 247 participants
Low

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

Repetition of SH at 6 months' · adults who engage in SH

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable… showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at 6 months' compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.67 [0.08, 5.68]
1 study · 18 participants
Low

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

Frequency of SH at 12 months · adults who engage in SH

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Low

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · adults who engage in SH

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable… may leads to lower repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.34 [0.13, 0.88]
2 studies · 83 participants
Low

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

Frequency of SH at post‐intervention · adults who engage in SH

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 83 participants
Low

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

Mentalisation vs TAU · adults who engage in SH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found