evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

178 questions · 184 findings · 13 reviews · Back and Neck

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 35 · 19%GRADE not reported 9 · 4.9%Very low 37 · 20.1%Low 48 · 26.1%Moderate 48 · 26.1%High 7 · 3.8%

Intervention not reported

Disability Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (transformed 0 to 100) · patients with acute low back pain
1 finding from 1 review

Acute Radiculopathy: Cervical Stretch/ROM + Cervical/Scapulothoracic/UE Strengthening + Static/Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs WAIT LIST

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with acute radiculopathy

Acute Radiculopathy: Cervical Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 10 worst pain ( compared with WAIT LIST (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Acute Radiculopathy: Cervical Stretch/ROM + Cervical/Scapulothoracic/UE Strengthening + Static/Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs WAIT LIST

Function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( · patients with acute radiculopathy

Acute Radiculopathy: Cervical Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( compared with WAIT LIST (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Acute Radiculopathy: Cervical Stretch/ROM + Cervical/Scapulothoracic/UE Strengthening + Static/Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs WAIT LIST

Global assessment (patient) Patient satisfaction on scale 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) · patients with acute radiculopathy

Acute Radiculopathy: Cervical Stretch/ROM +… showed no clear difference in patient Satisfaction: 5‐point scale, 1 to 5; very satisfied to… compared with WAIT LIST (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Acute to subacute CGH: Cervical stretch/ROM vs sham

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with subAcute cervicogenic headache (CGH)

Acute to subacute CGH: Cervical stretch/ROM showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 100 worst pain ( compared with SHAM (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in pain Intensity: VAS 0 no pain to 10 worst pain ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in function: NPNPQ 0% no disability to 100% maximum disability ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance Training + Craniocervical Pressure Biofeedback + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs no intervention

Global Perceived Effect · patients with Chronic CGH

Chronic CGH: Cervical/Scapulothoracic Strengthening with Endurance… showed no clear difference in global Perceived Effect: VAS 0 to 100 ( compared with NO INTERVENTION (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review