Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2,543 questions · 2,589 findings · 168 reviews · Schizophrenia

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 601 · 23.2%GRADE not reported 446 · 17.2%Very low 721 · 27.8%Low 505 · 19.5%Moderate 274 · 10.6%High 42 · 1.6%

HIV ADVICE vs NO HIV ADVICE

Service use: Hospitalisation · people with serious mental illness

1 finding from 1 review

HIV prevention advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

HIV ADVICE vs NO HIV ADVICE

Economic outcomes: Cost of care · people with serious mental illness

1 finding from 1 review

HIV prevention advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

HIV ADVICE vs NO HIV ADVICE

Safe practice: 1. Sexual practice/knowledge · people with serious mental illness

1 finding from 1 review

HIV prevention advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

HIV ADVICE vs NO HIV ADVICE

Safe practice: 2. Needle practice/knowledge · people with serious mental illness

1 finding from 1 review

HIV prevention advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Smoking cessation advice vs usual care

Raised awareness of common problems associated with smoking · people with people with serious mental illness

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Smoking cessation advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Smoking cessation advice vs usual care

Reduction in smoking · people with people with serious mental illness

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Smoking cessation advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Smoking cessation advice vs usual care

Healthy days · people with people with serious mental illness

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Smoking cessation advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Smoking cessation advice vs usual care

Adverse events: Clinically important effect · people with people with serious mental illness

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Smoking cessation advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Smoking cessation advice vs usual care

Economic outcomes · people with people with serious mental illness

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Smoking cessation advice for people with serious mental illness 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Active education + Support for implementation vs Routine care or Passive dissemination

Process outcome, Practitioner Impact 1. Polypharmacy at · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

It is very uncertain whether active education + Support for implementation changes process outcome, Practitioner Impact 1. Polypharmacy at compared with routine care or Passive dissemination (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.97 [0.75, 1.25]
2 studies · 310 participants
Very low

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Process outcome, Practitioner Impact 5. Staff did not provide psychological interventions (as suggested by the guideline) · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

Re‐written guideline text showed no clear difference in process outcome, Practitioner Impact 5. Staff did not provide… compared with original guideline text (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.86 [0.62, 1.18]
1 study · 68 participants
Low

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Patient outcome: Global state · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Patient outcome: Satisfaction with care · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Adherence · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Drug attitude—DAI · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Patient outcome: Quality of life · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Active education + Support for implementation vs Routine care or Passive dissemination

Process outcome, Practitioner Impact: 2. Not screened for cardiovascular risk, Framingham score (corrected for design effect) · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

It is very uncertain whether active education + Support for implementation changes process outcome, Practitioner Impact: 2. Not screened for… compared with routine care or Passive dissemination (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.71 [0.48, 1.03]
1 study · 38 participants
Very low

Active education + Support for implementation vs Routine care or Passive dissemination

Patient outcome: Global state: average score (PANSS total, high = poor) · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 59 participants
Very low

Active education + Support for implementation vs Routine care or Passive dissemination

Patient outcome: satisfaction with care: average score (ZUF8, high = better satisfaction) · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 46 participants
Very low

Active education + Support for implementation vs Routine care or Passive dissemination

Patient outcome: treatment adherence: not adherent at · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

It is very uncertain whether active education + Support for implementation changes patient outcome: treatment adherence: not adherent at compared with routine care or Passive dissemination (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implementation of treatment guidelines for specialist mental health care 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.44, 1.85]
1 study · 52 participants
Very low