Intervention not reported
Depression Post‐treatment Lower scores = lower reported depression · Children and adolescents with chronic pain
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Disability Post‐treatment Lower scores = lower reported disability · Children and adolescents with chronic pain
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Anxiety Post‐treatment Lower scores = lower reported anxiety · Children and adolescents with chronic pain
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Depression Post‐treatment Lower scores = lower reported depression · Children and adolescents with chronic pain
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Pain Post‐treatment Lower scores = lower reported pain intensity · Children and adolescents with chronic pain
1 finding from 1 review
Depression (lower scores mean less depression) · clinical diagnosis of depression
1 finding from 1 review
Depression (lower scores mean less depression) · clinical diagnosis of depression
1 finding from 1 review
Any cancer risk No. of participants: 19,475 (3 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in any cancer risk No. of participants: 19,475 (3 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cancer mortality risk No. of participants: 17,448 (1 RCT) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in cancer mortality risk No. of participants: 17,448 (1 RCT) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Colorectal cancer risk (16 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in colorectal cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Non‐melanoma skin cancer risk No. of participants: 2027 (2 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in non‐melanoma skin cancer risk No. of participants: 2027 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Lung cancer risk (17 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in lung cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Breast cancer risk (14 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in breast cancer risk No. of participants: 802 (1 RCT) compared with lowest selenium exposure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in bladder cancer risk No. of participants: 19,009 (2 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prostate cancer risk (13 studies) · Participants in trials with low risk of bias
Highest showed no clear difference in prostate cancer risk No. of participants: 18,942 (4 RCTs) compared with lowest selenium exposure (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Caesarean section ‐ low risk group · nurses, midwives, physicians
The intervention showed no clear difference in caesarean section ‐ low risk group (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
High
Intervention not reported
Activities of daily living (ADL) (Barthel Index score 0 to 20; lower = 0; median 3‐month · adults with acute stroke
The intervention showed no clear difference in activities of daily living (ADL) (Barthel Index score 0 to 20; lower… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Subjective Health Status score (Assessment of Quality of Life Score 0 to 1; lower = 0; end of scheduled · adults with acute stroke
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes subjective Health Status score (Assessment of Quality of Life Score… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Low cord pH · women in the second stage of labour with epidural anaesthesia
Upright position probably leads to lower low cord pH compared with recumbent position (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of upper body disorders (neck, shoulder, and upper extremity) Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers
Arm support combined with alternative mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of upper body disorders (neck, shoulder, and upper… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review