Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,793 questions · 1,866 findings · 339 reviews

No studies found 245 · 13.1%GRADE not reported 142 · 7.6%Very low 612 · 32.8%Low 513 · 27.5%Moderate 305 · 16.3%High 49 · 2.6%

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Cognitive functioning: clinically important change Not attaining normal cognitive function (Memory Digit Span) · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) changes cognitive functioning: clinically important change Not attaining… compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) changes leaving the study early: For any reason compared with COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) changes leaving the study early: For any reason compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review